Ecstatic in the Poison by Andrew Hudgins
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
In the preface to his 2003 poetry collection, Ecstatic in the Poison, Andrew Hudgins makes a surprising juxtaposition between some lines of Wallace Stevens and the remarks of Miss Alabama from the question and answer section at the 1994 Miss Universe Pageant. Despite their seeming incongruities though, these two quotations both share an obsession with mortality that carries over to the rest of Hudgins’ collection, which ultimately works to close the distance between Stevens’ elevated language and Miss Alabama’s profoundly simple musing, “if we were supposed to live forever than we would live forever.”
Hudgins’ poetic struggle to overcome this notion of mortality manifests itself in the collection through the presence of human voices, which, usually singing or laughing, suggest the power of the human imagination to transform the world around them.
In the last few lines of “In,” the first poem in the collection, Hudgins not only reveals the source of the collection’s title but also creates one of the more lasting images of this imaginative power, as several disembodied children’s voices laugh and sing within a thick bank of fog, “ecstatic in the poison.” Throughout his collection, these voices return in various guises to alleviate or redeem the morbid fears upon which a lot of Hudgins’ poetry appears to operate.
In the poem “Blur” from his 2003 collection, Ecstatic in the Poison, Hudgins’s speaker gets directly at how these voices and the fear of death work in opposition to each other: “It was my duty to stay awake and sing if I could keep my mind on singing, not extinction, as blurred green summer, lifted to its apex, succumbed to gravity and fell to autumn, Ilium, and ashes.” Personally though, I found the moments where Hudgins’ abandons this rhetoric of voices for the surrealism of his imagination to make for the most compelling moments.
By reveling in these defamiliarizing, yet never entirely unbelievable moments—the disembodied voices of children in the fog, the discovery of a Cadillac in an attic, the appearance of a flock of flamingos in Ohio—Hudgins’ speaker confronts the strange wonder of mortality, without the sense of dread that weighs down some of his other work. Hudgins also does an excellent job of constructing metaphors that complicate more than they satisfy the reader’s desire to make sense of his poetry. Ultimately, it is this complication of meaning that instills the reader with the same sense of wonder and awe that Hudgins’ pursues in his work and causes it to linger long after reading.
Ryan Marr
In the concluding lines of “Montage with Neon, Bok Choi, Gasoline, Lovers & Strangers,” poet Suji Kwock Kim directly presents the irresolvable internal conflict between memory and identity that underlies much of the poetry in her 2003 collection Notes from the Divided Country: “may you never see what we saw/ may you never do what we’ve done/ may you never remember & may you never forget.”

Opening up Alex Lemon’s collection Fancy Beasts is akin to taking a sudden plunge into a sea of images focused around American life. Each poem has the ability to stand alone, but put together, they speak to each other through Lemon’s use of everyday phrases and brand names. Throughout his poems, Lemon experiments with unconventional line breaks, and in some of them, he makes use of the somewhat older poetic convention of capitalizing the first word of every line. Both of these form decisions confused me at first, but the content of Lemon’s poems do not suffer from his choices. Though some of his images are rather gruesome, they also function very effectively in the context of his poems – the startling appearance of these gruesome descriptions jolt the reader into feeling the emotions of his poem even more clearly. Two examples of this dark description occur when he says the “the man gives birth / to a dead dog” in his poem titled “it had only been dead a few hours,” and when he says “what it means to have your face scalped neatly away” from his poem “haunt”.